Nikon D800e / D800 Dynamic Range Article

[Updated] check out my Nikon D800e Dynamic Range field test results here .

It Must be my lucky day – running low on writing juice today and then my buddy Petr Hlavacek passed me a link to an article he has written on his shooting experiences with the D800e – specifically the extreme Dynamic range capabilities of the Nikon D800/e. Petr’s experiences are very much in line with mine – the D800 family is a whole new ballgame when it comes to dynamic range.  I will post my findings soon. Are any of you D800 shooters finding the same thing? Cheers – Todd

Read more Nikon D800 or D800e articles on The Photo Autocracy

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii User Review | For Landscape & Nature Photography

Seeing as my Nikon Prime v Zoom review seemed moderately popular earlier this week, I have decided to post my thoughts on the 70-200mm f2.8 VRii here on WordPress – enjoy & share.  Feel free to ask any questions in the comments.  Cheers – Todd.

I won’t mess about – the Nikkor 70-200 f2.8 VR II is an incredible weapon for landscape photographers – quite simply, this lens has been a revelation for my long lens landscape photography, particularly when paired with the D800e and D7000.

If you think you need this lens, you need this lens.  Read no further – just buy it.

Nikon 70-200 VRII f/2.8

The Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII: a landscape photographer’s best friend – assuming you have no human friends…..

Before we start:

I am a landscape & nature photographer – a simple man. I am not a lens designer, lens tester, or nuclear physicist – I don’t know a Bayer pattern from a sewing pattern and I have yet to come across an MTF test chart in the wild (I dread that day – I hear they can be viscious).  The results here are no more than my opinions and observations and are based on exactly zero scientific research.  With that said, I hope that this is of some value to you – enjoy!


I purchased the 70-200 f2.8 VR II in April 2012, in anticipation of receiving a brand spanking new Nikon D800e.  At the time my long lens option was restricted to the surprisingly capable (with caveats) Nikon AF-S 55-200mm f4-5.6G VR IF ED for use on the nikon D7000.  

I had previously owned a nikon 80-200 f2.8 AF-D, a lens that I never came to love.  I may have had a poor sample but the 80-200 f2.8 ‘s weight and poor handling never seemed to be adequately offset by stellar image quality. The 80-200 seemed to suffer from focus accuracy issues out towards infinity.

If truth be known, I actually didn’t want to buy the 70-200 f2.8 VR II thanks to it’s cost and weight.  This was compounded by the fact  that I had been using the Canon 70-200 f4 L IS for over three years.  The Canon lens is spectacular from wide open and incredibly light – if Nikon had built an equivalent f4 lens I would have taken it.  Nikon doesn’t make such a lens and I was pretty much forced into buying the 70-200 f2.8 VR II as my only tele zoom option for the D800e – I am glad that I did.

Technical Specifications

Tech specs deplete my will to live.   After 20 years of photography I am no closer to understanding why I would care about the number of optical elements in a lens design – it either works or it doesn’t.  Hence I present you with no lens cross section diagrams, discussion of lens coatings or tech specs – just practical results and findings. You can find the specs on the B&H product page.

Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 In The Field

Field Handling: The 70-200 f/2.8 VRII handled being in this field really well. (Attached to a D800e and clamped down to a Benro Tripod)

But seriously, on to handling. The 70-200 f2.8 VR II weighs in at a relatively hefty 1530g – about 250g more than my old 80-200 f2.8 AF-D.  Now, given that I ditched the 80-200 largely due to it’s weight this should be an issue, but it’s not.

Somehow, somebody did something to something within the design of the 70-200 VR II.  That something that somebody did has made the lens wonderfully balanced to work with – I just don’t notice the weight, and as we will see soon, the results more than compensate for the inconvenience.

When it comes to handling, the lens is terrific.  VR controls are well positioned, manual focus override is a cinch compared to the 80-200 (which involves pushing buttons and turning rings to move from AF to M) – just grab and focus. The zoom ring has a wonderfully positive tension to it and it’s position is excellent for use when hand-holding.

Of course zoom and focus are handled internally on a lens of this calibre so there are no protruding extensions during operation – everything just happens on the inside – all very deep and meaningful.

Build Quality

The 70-200 f2.8 VR II is an exceptional piece of engineering – it is one of those rare cases where you can see and feel where your money went.  The lens housing is reassuringly metallic – I believe that it is constructed of the same magnesium alloy used in Nikon’s pro camera bodies.  Yes, that mottled metallic finish that nikon moulds into it’s plastic products is actually for real this time – nice.   All this metallic heft and bulk leaves you with the impression that, if money were no object, one could happily use the lens to hammer tent pegs while on a photo-safari.

I have yet to test the weather/dust sealing of the lens to extremes. I have never had any issues with weather sealing even on my cheapest Nikkors, so I presume that this will be the case with the 70-200 f2.8 VR II.

Evidence of build-quality can be found by simply twisting the tripod collar locking nut.  The collar swivels around with a velvety motion and the locking is extremely positive, going from free to locked in about half a turn.

But my favourite example of this build quality is the HB-48 lens hood. To me, it is a thing of great beauty, with a stylish yet manly petal shape and, for want of a better term, it mates beautifully with the lens.  This coupling is consummated audibly when the metal locking mechanism clicks into place.  A better lens hood I have not owned.

Focus Performance

The  70-200 f2.8 VR II is the fastest and most accurate lens that I currently own.   It locks onto subjects rapidly even under dim lighting conditions.

Nikon’s silent wave motor has not always been that silent in my experience but on the 70-200 f2.8 it truly lives up to its name, operation is quiet and fast.

When paired with a relatively high performance body it tracks focus effortlessly – I am no bird or sports photographer, but I am father to two hyperactive kids and this lens just gets the shot when used on the D7000 or D800e.


Too Cute To Need A Title: AF-C Performance: Nikon D800e in DX mode (6fps) : f/2.8, 1/5000, ISO 400 at 140mm 35mm equivalent . Sure, the D800 has state-of-the-art AF, but paired with the 70-200mm f2.8 it delivers incredible tracking performance with the press of the AF-start button.


AF-C Performance: Nikon D800e in DX mode (6fps) : f/2.8, 1/5000, ISO 400 at 140mm 35mm equivalent – 100% crops – no sharpening applied, focus point set to Indi’s chest. I am too lazy to give you a crop of every shot in this sequence, so here are some loupe screen shots at 100% – I couldn’t cram a loupe onto every shot so you will have to believe me that every shot in this sequence was technically usable. The 70-200 f2.8 VR II delivers stunning AF performance.

Vibration Reduction (VR) Performance

The 70-200 f2.8 VR II is the first top of the range Nikon VR lens that I have owned and I am very, very, impressed by its stabilisation performance.

I have had my reservations about the performance of Nikon’s VR on my first generation 18-200mm VR DX and 16-85 VR DX lenses.  To me it has never seemed that effective.  This impression was only reinforced when I purchased the Canon 24-105 f4 l IS and 70-200 f4 L IS lenses.  The Canon IS system just seemed more aggressive or ‘active’ to me – it may not be the case but that is the way it seems and I have come to rely upon it when shooting handheld – especially with people.

I am happy to report that the VR on the 70-200 f2.8 is stellar, and easily in the same league as the IS on my Canon lenses – probably better in fact, and certainly quieter. Check it out.

Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR II vr test

Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR II – VR Effectiveness: 1/30th Second, 200mm. Check out the sharpness in that loupe – and Nikon issued warnings about the D800e not being hand-holdable. Nuts! to that I say – I got two in a row like this at 1/30th at 200mm. VRII works wonders. Did I mention that I am very impressed with the VR on this lens?

Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR II vr test  copy

Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR II – VR Effectiveness: 1/10th Second, 200mm. I needed to shoot something that didn’t move to go this slow. 75% of these images at 1/10th were usable. I even managed to get a sharp shot at half a second at 200mm! Did I mention that I am very impressed with the VR on this lens?


Zoom versus Prime Review – Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii v Nikon 85mm f/1.4G


Zoom vs Prime – which is better for landscape photography?  I decided to pit two of Nikon’s best lenses  ( 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii & Nikon 85mm f/1.4G) against each other in a field test death match. This is Chevy vs Ford, PC vs Mac, Coke vs Pepsi for nikonians. Let the fun commence….

If you have read my nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 VRii user review and my nikkor 85mm f/1.4G user review you will know that I was less than stoked about the prospect of dropping $5,300NZ (Pacific Pesos) on two lenses.  I was especially freaked about my impulse decision to buy the 85mm f1.4, as it seemingly made very little practical sense for landscape photography (which comprises the bulk of my work).

So, now that the D800e is finally with me I decided to have a bit of a side by side shoot off between the big zoom and the rotund prime just to see if there were any noticeable differences between the two.

To be honest, I have always viewed prime lenses as somewhat of a throwback and a pain in the butt  – the convenience of zoom lenses has always won out for me.  I was hoping that the results of my tests would validate my impulses to fill my bag with convenient zooms.

Frankly, the results of my testing freaked me so much that I had to re-shoot them to make sure I hadn’t messed it up somehow.  I don’t want to spoil the rest of the review, so I won’t elaborate – enjoy the review and be sure to share it around if you think it may be of interest to others.
The fine print – all shots are:

  • Made on the Nikon D800e
  • Locked down on a Really Right Stuff BH55 ballhead & Benro tripod
  • 3 second mirror lockup delay
  • Aperture priority
  • All other camera settings remain the same between shots
  • Images straight through Adobe Camera Raw with no adjustments (except sharpening 25 to all shots)
  • 100% crops
  • focus set manually by Liveview on the grey willow tree in centre frame
  • if this methodology infuriates you in any way please go straight to here

Centre Sharpness

Sharpness Comparison : Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii v Nikon 85mm f/1.4 G – at f/2.8 – click image for full size

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 vs 85mm f/1.4G at f2.8

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii vs 85mm f/1.4G – Centre Sharpness Comparison @ f/2.8

Sharpness Comparison : Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii v Nikon 85mm f/1.4 G – at f/5.6 – click image for full size

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii vs 85mm f/1.4G - Centre Sharpness Comparison @ f/5.6

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii vs 85mm f/1.4G – Centre Sharpness Comparison @ f/5.6

Sharpness Comparison : Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii v Nikon 85mm f/1.4 G – at f/8 – click image for full size

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii vs 85mm f/1.4G - Centre Sharpness Comparison @ f/8

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii vs 85mm f/1.4G – Centre Sharpness Comparison @ f/8

Sharpness Comparison : Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii v Nikon 85mm f/1.4 G – at f/11 – click image for full size

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii vs 85mm f/1.4G - Centre Sharpness Comparison @ f/11

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii vs 85mm f/1.4G – Centre Sharpness Comparison @ f/11

f/11 notes: centre sharpness on the zoom really falls away at f/11 on the D800e while the 85mm still looks pretty good.  Diffraction really is something that you need to consider before paying the premium to purchase a D800e vs a D800 – any resolution gains that you may make on the D800e are rapidly eroded after f5.6.

Centre Sharpness Roundup

Frankly, there is not much to separate these two premium lenses when looking at the centre of frame in terms of landscape photography performance. Not many landscape images are made at f/2.8 where the nikon 85mm f1.8G trounces the zoom – not a surprise given that it is already stopped down two stops by this point.

By f/5.6 results are so close that only a nit-picker would give a toss and by f/8 diffraction has equalised both lens’s centre sharpness performance, with maybe a slight edge to the 85mm.  Where the game changes is in the final 30% of the frame heading towards the edges – take a gander at these comparisons…..

Edge Sharpness Tests >>>>

More Nikon D800e Sample Photos | D800e landscape shots

Howdy folks!

Just thought that I would post a few snaps from a trip up to the Blue Lake that I made with my kids, Jack & Indi, this week.

These were all made on the D800e handheld with the remarkable Nikon 85mm f1.4G (review in progress :-). These images illustrate the exceptional sharpness and bokeh produced by this lens when used in tandem with the full frame D800. None of the images have been substantially enhanced in LR4 – just a dab of output sharpening and some clarity (I find that I do very little to many of my D800e images – they are so nice out of the box).

UPDATED: I have moved the full resolution D800e sample images from Flickr to my Photoshelter account – use the password freeD800pics to download them

Follow this blog or join us on facebook for regular updates and pretty pictures :-)

Cheers – Todd

Read more Nikon D800 or D800e articles on The Photo Autocracy

The Nikon D800 / D800e Handheld (sample images)

It transpires that the Nikon D800 be hand held with excellent results – but we all knew this would be the case.

There has been quite a bit of discussion online as to whether handheld D800 images would look like 36MP versions of a 2005 cell phone camera image.  This fear was largely fuelled by Nikon’s own pre-launch warnings (straight from the legal department) about the D800 spontaneously combusting if hand held. Luckily some lab-coat toting boffins quickly figured out that the D800 has the same pixel pitch (same sized pixels) as the Nikon D7000.  I have been hand holding shots on  the D7000 for a year and have never had any nasty surprises when using proper technique.

Take a gander at this shot.  Sure, it is not my finest work from an artistic perspective, but it is pretty much technically perfect.  The point you ask?

To make this shot, I put down my beer, ambled out of my In-Law’s lounge, cranked the ISO to 400 and proceeded to hand-held a series of shots using the D800e and the exceptional nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 VRII.   I tested the efficacy of the VR system on this lens in my complete lens review : view my handheld 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII sample images.

As you will see below, the shots out of the can looked absolutely terrible, but after 4 minutes in LR4 this was the result – a tack sharp hand held image that has complete tonal range with no blown highlights.

Download the full resolution D800e sample JPEGS

More D800e blog posts

Cheers – Todd

PS – remember to subscribe to this blog for more Nikon D800 information and goodness-)

Landscape image sample taken on the D800e with nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VRII – All that colour in the sky has been achieved simply by reducing the exposure using a LR4 grad filter and some vibrance. The DR of the D800 is incredible.

nikon D800e handheld 100% crop

nikon D800e handheld 100% crop

The original camera file – it looks like a train wreck, but it is not so. The D800e arrived at this exposure (it tends to do a great job of knowing it’s own limits and exposes to the right consistently well, which retains heaps of tonal and colour info in the shadows)

Wellington – College Street

Here are a few images I made while walking around College Street in Wellington yesterday.

All made on the D800e and using the nikkor 50mm f/1.8 lens. The D800e was set to auto-ISO (max 6400) Daylight or Auto WB. I was incredibly impressed by the metering on the D800e but the real ‘eye-opener’ was the amount and quality of highlight recovery on the D800e.

I mention quality, because I have often found that ‘recovered’ highlights lack texture detail and colour – not the case on the D800e.

Check out some samples over on the website:

Cheers – Todd